The United Nations Security Council, gathered in the summit as a real
institutional world government, took unanimously the decision, in its
resolution 1887 ” to look for a more secured world for all and to create the
conditions for a world without nuclear weapons.”
Cette instance devient de fait un tête à tête entre les Etats-Unis et la Chine.
Despite the media brainwashing, and apart from laudatory comments from some
politicians, not one qualified expert can take seriously what was played in
Pittsburgh.
The G-20 Pittsburgh summit will closely look like that of London.
The debates on the possible removal of the investigating judge and the
possible creation of a tax on the production of carbon dioxide reveal a
worrying trend on the public spirit: everything takes place as if, for
people, a decision announced by the executive had force of law.
L’Assemblée du FMI à Istanbul est plus importante que le G20 de Pittsburgh qui ne changera rien.
The question is nevertheless fundamental: how will the left-wing candidate
be selected for the presidential elections of 2012?
It is surprising to see leaders of the opposition, who should only think
about finding the best solutions to the current crisis than those in power,
throw such ridiculous anathemas at each other. We can be in revolt seeing
the heirs of François Mitterrand committing political suicide while they
have the electoral majority.
Everyone knows
also that there will be no revival of the construction of Europe without a
revival of the joint projects between Germany and France.
